<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why a Digg Review Section is a Dumb Idea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michikono.com/2007/06/12/why-a-digg-review-section-is-a-dumb-idea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michikono.com/2007/06/12/why-a-digg-review-section-is-a-dumb-idea/</link>
	<description>Stuff only Michi cares to read</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 10:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Motorcycle Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.michikono.com/2007/06/12/why-a-digg-review-section-is-a-dumb-idea/#comment-4179</link>
		<dc:creator>Motorcycle Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 19:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michiknows.com/2007/06/12/why-a-digg-review-section-is-a-dumb-idea/#comment-4179</guid>
		<description>It probably has to do with it being someone&#039;s passion at digg to do restuarant reviews.  They probably could bring innovation to it and bringing it under the digg name might help to launch it, but I by no means think they should have it a s a main part of the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It probably has to do with it being someone&#8217;s passion at digg to do restuarant reviews.  They probably could bring innovation to it and bringing it under the digg name might help to launch it, but I by no means think they should have it a s a main part of the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michi</title>
		<link>http://www.michikono.com/2007/06/12/why-a-digg-review-section-is-a-dumb-idea/#comment-4005</link>
		<dc:creator>Michi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 05:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michiknows.com/2007/06/12/why-a-digg-review-section-is-a-dumb-idea/#comment-4005</guid>
		<description>#8: dude, that&#039;s an awesome picture (click the link).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#8: dude, that&#8217;s an awesome picture (click the link).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to Make the Front Page on Digg Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.michikono.com/2007/06/12/why-a-digg-review-section-is-a-dumb-idea/#comment-4002</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Make the Front Page on Digg Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 04:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michiknows.com/2007/06/12/why-a-digg-review-section-is-a-dumb-idea/#comment-4002</guid>
		<description>[...] huh? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] huh? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michi</title>
		<link>http://www.michikono.com/2007/06/12/why-a-digg-review-section-is-a-dumb-idea/#comment-3991</link>
		<dc:creator>Michi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michiknows.com/2007/06/12/why-a-digg-review-section-is-a-dumb-idea/#comment-3991</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know why, but Pat&#039;s comment makes me smile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know why, but Pat&#8217;s comment makes me smile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Ejtel</title>
		<link>http://www.michikono.com/2007/06/12/why-a-digg-review-section-is-a-dumb-idea/#comment-3985</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Ejtel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michiknows.com/2007/06/12/why-a-digg-review-section-is-a-dumb-idea/#comment-3985</guid>
		<description>Although I agree with the points you mention pertaining to the specifics of the implementation such as the need of geo-targeting for service reviews, I feel that user generated reviews in general have enough of a broad appeal to provide value to the Digg reader base since over 90% of all internet surfers research their purchases online.  Whether there is a “geek” factor or not, that would only affect the breadth of reviews versus their value to the community. 

I also don’t necessarily agree with the fact most consumers only want to consume and not contribute when it comes to their consumer experiences. Data shows that over two thirds of all economic activity in North America is influenced by peer opinions and although the majority of this takes place offline today, why would it not be applicable online?  

Even though Digg is entering a market that competes with us directly, I applaud the move. I think peer experiences have an intrinsic monetary value that should be factored into every purchase. This means that I can see the day when every purchase will have an opportunity for the consumer to recoup some of their cost by sharing their experiences with peers, and the more players that jump on this bandwagon and provide vehicles to voice those opinions, the more legitimacy and growth will happen within the entire consumer experience market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I agree with the points you mention pertaining to the specifics of the implementation such as the need of geo-targeting for service reviews, I feel that user generated reviews in general have enough of a broad appeal to provide value to the Digg reader base since over 90% of all internet surfers research their purchases online.  Whether there is a “geek” factor or not, that would only affect the breadth of reviews versus their value to the community. </p>
<p>I also don’t necessarily agree with the fact most consumers only want to consume and not contribute when it comes to their consumer experiences. Data shows that over two thirds of all economic activity in North America is influenced by peer opinions and although the majority of this takes place offline today, why would it not be applicable online?  </p>
<p>Even though Digg is entering a market that competes with us directly, I applaud the move. I think peer experiences have an intrinsic monetary value that should be factored into every purchase. This means that I can see the day when every purchase will have an opportunity for the consumer to recoup some of their cost by sharing their experiences with peers, and the more players that jump on this bandwagon and provide vehicles to voice those opinions, the more legitimacy and growth will happen within the entire consumer experience market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.michikono.com/2007/06/12/why-a-digg-review-section-is-a-dumb-idea/#comment-3983</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michiknows.com/2007/06/12/why-a-digg-review-section-is-a-dumb-idea/#comment-3983</guid>
		<description>This is a horrible idea, digg should not turn into Facebook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a horrible idea, digg should not turn into Facebook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Boyd</title>
		<link>http://www.michikono.com/2007/06/12/why-a-digg-review-section-is-a-dumb-idea/#comment-3976</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Boyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michiknows.com/2007/06/12/why-a-digg-review-section-is-a-dumb-idea/#comment-3976</guid>
		<description>I agree, a restaurant review section on Digg is such a strange move.  From tech to restaurant reviews?  What an odd move.

If you look at Digg now, you can see that the traffic sent by the site to homepage stories is already dropping off.  Alexa data (I know, not a true reflection) also suggests stagnation, with a trend downwards.

The last thing on their mind show be expansion away from their core competency, ie. tech.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, a restaurant review section on Digg is such a strange move.  From tech to restaurant reviews?  What an odd move.</p>
<p>If you look at Digg now, you can see that the traffic sent by the site to homepage stories is already dropping off.  Alexa data (I know, not a true reflection) also suggests stagnation, with a trend downwards.</p>
<p>The last thing on their mind show be expansion away from their core competency, ie. tech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IPTV Free</title>
		<link>http://www.michikono.com/2007/06/12/why-a-digg-review-section-is-a-dumb-idea/#comment-3969</link>
		<dc:creator>IPTV Free</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michiknows.com/2007/06/12/why-a-digg-review-section-is-a-dumb-idea/#comment-3969</guid>
		<description>good points, I&#039;d also add that Digg users aren&#039;t looking for reviews, they generally know what they want and are capable of doing their own research. It just feels like Digg is trying to expand and the staff can&#039;t come up with any other ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good points, I&#8217;d also add that Digg users aren&#8217;t looking for reviews, they generally know what they want and are capable of doing their own research. It just feels like Digg is trying to expand and the staff can&#8217;t come up with any other ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pfctdayelise</title>
		<link>http://www.michikono.com/2007/06/12/why-a-digg-review-section-is-a-dumb-idea/#comment-3966</link>
		<dc:creator>pfctdayelise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michiknows.com/2007/06/12/why-a-digg-review-section-is-a-dumb-idea/#comment-3966</guid>
		<description>digg is not global. you only have to live outside the US to realise that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>digg is not global. you only have to live outside the US to realise that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gigio</title>
		<link>http://www.michikono.com/2007/06/12/why-a-digg-review-section-is-a-dumb-idea/#comment-3949</link>
		<dc:creator>Gigio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michiknows.com/2007/06/12/why-a-digg-review-section-is-a-dumb-idea/#comment-3949</guid>
		<description>hmm.. I agree.. i just don&#039;t see how the restaurant reviews fit into the Digg &quot;core business&quot;. At first look it would seem a great idea.. but you make a good point on why it&#039;s not.

btw, on that graph, I would say that they go from about ~2.5 to about ~1.7 (eye-balling an average for peaks) - so not exactly a half of page views.. but still a significant chunk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm.. I agree.. i just don&#8217;t see how the restaurant reviews fit into the Digg &#8220;core business&#8221;. At first look it would seem a great idea.. but you make a good point on why it&#8217;s not.</p>
<p>btw, on that graph, I would say that they go from about ~2.5 to about ~1.7 (eye-balling an average for peaks) &#8211; so not exactly a half of page views.. but still a significant chunk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Object Caching 450/454 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.michikono.com @ 2012-02-10 17:09:32 -->
