I just came across a really neat tool released by Yahoo called YSlow.
The basic idea is simple: it is a Firefox add-on that can be used to analyze pages you view. This analysis gives you important insight into why a particular page loads slow.
If you are a web developer in charge of the front end components, I urge you to check this tool out.
This post is less about politics and more about the Streisand Effect. Lately, I’ve noticed that the Ron Paul campaign seems to be benefiting from the Streisand Effect:
The name Streisand effect comes from a 2003 incident in which Barbra Streisand sued photographer Kenneth Adelman for $50 million in an attempt to have the aerial photo of her house removed from the publicly available collection of twelve thousand California coastline photographs, citing privacy concerns. Adelman was photographing beachfront property as a way to document coastal erosion. The picture of Streisand’s house that previously carried almost no interest to anyone suddenly spread all over the Internet.
In short, an attempt to cover up a piece of information leads directly to its rapid ascent in the consciousness of Internet users.
By my observation, the mainstream (especially the conservative) media has been playing down Ron Paul because they dismissed him as a long-shot candidate. Despite this, he has numerous accomplishments that are impressive for a candidate with only 1% of the national polls: #1 recipient of military donations, winner of the first Republican debate, and more money on hand than Giuliani. And yet you will have a very hard time finding main stream articles that cover these successes (go ahead, try to find them). Of course, Ron Paul supporters have been very active in pointing out these information deficiencies, creating an “outrage” against biased reporting.
As result of these facts being pointed out, we are seeing a massive interest in his candidacy on the Net – A.K.A. the Streisand Effect. Many times, I have wondered how much worse he would be doing right now if the media simply reported his accomplishments instead of omitting them in related articles. I can tell you right now, if it weren’t for the Streisand Effect being in action, I would have never written about this candidate (text book example of the Streisand Effect).
For example, when Ron Paul came in second at the FOX Republican Debate online poll, one of the anchors claimed that getting 10,000 people from the Net to vote is “not that tough.” (Prove him right by getting this article Dugg 10,000 times!) The video contains a humorous segment of the anchors insisting at how impossible it is to send a text message using a phone.
Or another example was when FOX dismissed the news that the top recipient of military donations was Paul by claiming he used some kind of “mailing list” that clearly no other (bigger) candidate could top…
I believe that as a direct consequence of videos such as these being spread, the Streisand Effect is dramatically helping the Paul campaign. When these videos were circulating about a month ago, the search term for “Ron Paul” on Technorati (a very popular blog search engine) was #1. As recent media attention has begun to recognize Paul in recent weeks, his rank has sunk to #3 (no other candidate currently appears in the top 10). In other words, the active suppression of his accomplishments may have contributed to his skyrocketing popularity online.
What makes this particular instance of the Streisand Effect so interesting is that its effect is not limited to online, which has been the case with most other popular instances of the effect. This makes sense given the state of the Internet as compared to a few years ago: it is now even more mainstream than ever. A staggering 1/3 of young adults get the news exclusively from the web (I am one of those people). So unlike previous incarnations of the effect, this instance is manifesting itself into “real life” in places like the debate polls.
So now that I have thrown this theory out there, keep a watchful eye on the media’s effect on his popularity. While it is possible that he is gaining popularity regardless, my theory is that his popularity grows much faster while the media continues to ignore him. This will hold especially true so long as his most loyal supporters continue to call the media out on their omissions.
Anyway, in closing I’d like to post this humorous video of Ron Paul owning a kid at some kind of talk show. It’s from 1988 and widely circulated, but it’s very funny if you haven’t seen it yet.
All this (plus the YouTube debates) just goes to show just how much the 2008 elections may be influenced by the Internet.
In case you missed the news, the latest Democratic presidential debate was hosted by CNN and YouTube last night. YouTube users were invited to submit questions, which were played live at the debate.
This was the first big step YouTube needed to break out of the “online only” mold. If all goes well, we should see YouTube grow even more as the mainstream world becomes aware of the site through the debate. It’s likely that many of the candidates never even saw a video on YouTube until last night, as with much of the audience watching them.
Anyway, the questions were fresh in the way they were presented, although there were a lot of regular fluff answers. Some of the questions asked were definitely tough. We should look forward to the CNN/YouTube Republican debate on September 17th. Now that this debate has been aired, I hope to see a new twist at the Republican debate after people saw what sort of questions would make it on the air.
You can find all of the questions here.
Recently, I had a neat idea for a website. I thought about what domain I could use. Being naive, I decided to do some searches on GoDaddy for some potential candidates. On June 6th, I am warming up to inmybelly.com, which was available. Two weeks pass, and I am ready to make the buy when I find out that it has been registered! Similar events have been reported by others before.
Coincidence? Perhaps. So I am going to do an experiment. I am going to search for domain names that could have some value to a squatter and see if they are taken. The domains I ran searches on GoDaddy for are for the time being, confidential to ensure readers don’t mess with my results. 🙂 I will run them through the search a second time in a week. Then, I will update this blog one additional week later with my results.
For the time being, I want to suggest to readers to always use the “whois” command from your Linux command line. 🙂
Pardon my pun, but it’s true: Digg.com is at a crossroads that’s making it hard for them to grow. Here are the issues at hand:
Combine these three factors, and you have a lot of unsatisfied “customers.”
Digg no longer serves a niche. When I first found Digg a year ago, it was amazing: you could always find new hidden treasures of the Internet on the front page. But nowadays, it has swerved dramatically “mainstream”, constantly covering the same anti-Iraq or pro-iPhone stories or spammed with links to funny pictures.
Digg’s hot topics have evolved into more mainstream dialog (inevitable as more users join). This alienates well-informed readers who first began at Digg looking for cutting edge articles not to be found anywhere else.
And of course, there is daily garbage that manages to reach the front page. With the increased exposure that Digg has, it is no wonder that people are now learning how to better game Digg. This has caused (at least for me) a noticeable drop in the quality of articles that hit the front page of Digg. This, combined with the influx of new “mainstream” users further lowers quality.
In short, Digg isn’t growing stronger due to its increased exposure: it is actually growing weaker. Proof? How about Digg’s traffic graph for the past six months:
In six months, Digg’s daily reach has fallen over 10%! How else can this be explained?
Kevin Rose talked about introducing a pictures or reviews section; these are not the solutions to this problem. The problem is that Digg is trying to appeal to everybody. It is trying to be the jack of all trades in news. It’s impossible.
What does Digg cover well? If you answer with “everything,” you just fell into the trap that Kevin Rose did. It covers nothing well. It doesn’t cover celebrity news as closely as tabloids. It doesn’t cover business development as closely any industry publication. It doesn’t cover Apple news as closely as Apple rumor blogs. It doesn’t cover politics as closely as the thousands of newspapers across the country.
The point is, Digg has scaling problems in the social sense. If it grows, it only covers more topics in less depth since front page space is always limited. As more users join, the collective opinion continues to “average out,” allowing more quality to slip through the cracks, especially on niche topics.
And this is why Digg is stuck between a rock and a hard place. Digg’s competitors are best to leave their news sites in their respective niches rather than branching out.
If Sony’s goal is to introduce a new PS3 model in the coming months, and it can only happen once the old one sells out, what happens if that takes too long?
It was big news yesterday when the PS3 topped Amazon electronic sales for two days straight after the $100 “price drop.” But then there was a huge uproar today when SCEE president said that the 60GB PS3 was being discontinued and that there would be a new 80GB model introduced at the $599 price. Lots of people cried foul, saying that Sony was basically dumping their inventory to make room for the new expensive model.
But I must ask, what happens if Sony can’t sell the remaining inventory fast enough? No. Really. Think about this.
Sony wants to introduce a new PS3 model as early as possible to regain a competitive “we have a big hard drive too” foothold against Microsoft’s Xbox Elite. Unfortunately releasing this new upgrade would completely destroy demand for a 60GB PS3.
We saw this once before when the 20GB model was discontinued. This meant a PS3 could only be purchased at $599 (since the $499 ones were gone). History is repeating itself and the 60GB is going next.
This means that this price drop is only temporary!
This was a fine plan so long as nobody realized there was a new PS3 coming. Sales were doing great yesterday as proof. However, now that everybody knows the 60GB is soon outdated, and with rumors flying that the 80GB will have rumble, what will happen now?
There are approximately two million unsold 60GB PS3s right now sitting in stores (calculated by comparing the sale vs shipped counts). Sony can’t introduce the 80GB without seriously harming its retailers. It took Sony nine months to sell four million PS3s. Assuming the sales rate doubles, they would sell out in two or three months (October). Their master plan could have been to cut the top-end price by $100 in November. That is, so long as the 60GB sells out fast enough.
So long as there are major retail inventories left, Sony can’t launch a new “upgrade” without seriously harming (angering) their retail relationships. Brushing aside the new rumor that the Xbox is seeing a permanent $100 price drop in two weeks, I wonder what happens if PS3 sales slow down because everybody decides to “wait for the 80GB with rumble?”
The leak of this news may have caused serious harm to Sony. I still can’t believe how Sony executives keep saying insanely stupid things without getting fired. After their impressive showing at E3, all they had to do was stay quiet!
Do you have the business intelligence to bring on a smart technical partner? Let me share with you a little story so you can answer that for yourself.
A year ago, I was approached by a person who was doing a start up. He invited me out for dinner to talk about the venture. He made me sign a non-disclosure and then told me all about his idea. As I listened, I became convinced his idea hadn’t been thought through. It lacked a solid revenue model and had no business plan. He had failed to do research such as costs of operation, primary competitors, and whether or not there was even a demand for his idea.
I politely told him all sorts of issues he needed to address before I could consider his opportunity. I gave him a lot of free technical advice as well as some suggestions for revenue streams. He wrote it all down, shook my hand, and the meeting ended.
A week later he emails me a document. The document was clearly rushed (grammatical errors abound). Nevertheless, it contained a business model, use cases, and other important considerations I had asked him to make. I was a little taken aback that they were rushing such critically important steps, but I let it slide. He offered me a substantial stake in the company in exchange for technical guidance and some (relatively easy) development work.
I took a week to think over the idea. I decided the idea was simply not good enough to succeed. I declined his offer and told him I would be happy to give him advice as he needs it on a casual basis.
I received no reply.
Months go by and I read news about another startup doing something very similar to what he was doing. I sent him information about this startup in hopes of helping him out.
I received no reply.
That was the last time I decided I would offer any form of help to this individual.
My story illustrates some important things this man did wrong:
The point of this story isn’t whether or not his business succeeded (it did not, as far as I know); rather, the point is that good will shouldn’t be needlessly ignored. If you plan on starting a business one day, I hope you are taking notes! Allow me to address each mistake:
The sad part is that this isn’t the only time I’ve seen someone make these mistakes in front of me. A few times a year, I receive offers from entrepreneurs of new business ideas they want to “share” with me. Some people do this well, and I gain respect for them. But most people suffer from extreme self denial. The problem is that people get too caught up in their own world/ego to realize that they need the help of others far more than those people need them.
In summary:
If you’ve ever wondered why highly successful CEOs tend to be extremely friendly people, now you know why.
Okay, so the rumor is confirmed: the PS3 is dropping its price. Some even say the rumble feature is returning (my money is on there being no rumble for the PS3, ever). But it has long been anticipated that Microsoft would steal Sony’s thunder by immediately following with a price drop of its own.
However, here’s what’s interesting: you still can’t get a PS3 for cheaper than $500.
You see, even though Sony “dropped” the price, they eliminated the $499 20 GB model. Thus, the 60 GB model is the new 20 GB model. The 20 GB model is gone forever (instead of cutting its price to a more affordable $399? Idiots!). And in the end, it costs just as much money to buy a PS3, except now you get a bigger hard drive. Will this spur sales? Initially, I’m sure any perceived price cut will help. But as the dust settles and people realize the PS3 still costs exactly what it cost when it launched, I highly doubt this price cut will be any revolution. So what’s Microsoft’s next move?
Microsoft has positioned themselves for a price cut for a few months now. They even released a high end Xbox (Elite) so that they could pull the exact same stunt the PS3 did. Now that the rumored PS3 price cut is not really a price reduction, it’s very likely that Microsoft will hold off on the price cuts — for now. There is simply no point in destroying the little thunder (more like a hum) that Sony has generated.
Rather, Microsoft, like the sly fox it is, will wait until October to slash its prices. It will slash its prices right before the holidays and create a renewed buzz. If Sony caves, they will have to follow with a cut of their own, forcing them into two price cuts in a six months. Of course, if the past is any indicator, Sony won’t follow Microsoft’s Q4 price cut, and Microsoft will gain a ton of new money conscious customers who have been waiting for a machine that doesn’t cost them as much as an iPhone (wait, that really puts the iPhone’s price in perspective, but that’s for another post).
I could also mention that Nintendo is a factor, but with the Wiis still selling out, I highly doubt they have any need to cut their prices for the time being.
The Wii is out-selling the PS3 6:1 in Japan! It’s selling just over 15:1 to the Xbox 360.
There seems to be a trend: the Wii was ahead of the PS3 4:1 in April, 5:1 in May, and now 6:1 in June.
Nintendo has sold – not shipped – 5.84 million Wiis world wide in the first five months after launch. Sony hasn’t stated how many they’ve sold, but they have shipped (as in, shipped to stores) 5.5 million PS3 units, world wide since launch (seven months). Japan accounts for just under half of all Wii console sales.
That either means PS3s are selling far better in other countries to make up for this huge difference, picked up a lot of slack in the 5th, 6th, and 7th month, or there is a lot of unsold stock sitting around, all over the world. I won’t pass judgement here without the facts so I don’t upset some of my Sony fan readers…
As always, I’m impressed with the Wii. It might be a cheap gimmick (maybe?), but it certainly hasn’t stopped it from dominating the crap out of the console market.
They’re still going for above retail on eBay (approximately $300 right now) – after seven months!
Update: It has now been confirmed at 700 thousand sales over the first weekend.
This past weekend, Apple sold 500 thousand iPhones, or 5% of 1-year sales goal. Assuming peak sales in the eight-week Christmas shopping season, that will match or beat this week, Apple’s going to hit their target early. Very early.
In case you didn’t know, Verizon was offered the iPhone first, but declined. Verizon is so stupid to turn down Apple. That’s 10 million new customers AT&T is going to get (or keep). AT&T must be walking in the clouds right now.
Apple’s competitors are going to have a hard time competing because the primary barrier to entry will still exist: the carrier. Apple was able to tell AT&T “No, we won’t have your crappy browser and ring tone selling software on our phone, and we are going to reduce text messages by pushing email functionality,” and AT&T simply had to accept it. The results speak for themselves: absolutely no AT&T software on the iPhone. But competitors such as Nokia, LG, or other hand held makers are screwed.
Competitors have to ask carriers such as Verizon to give them the same development freedom as Apple in order to compete, but Verizon rejected Apple for exactly that reason in the first place. No other phone in history will sell 500,000 in its first weekend, except perhaps future versions of the iPhone. Verizon had its chance, and it blew it. Verizon will make concessions simply because it doesn’t want to bleed all of its customers to AT&T, but it will be a slow process. They aren’t going to back peddle 180 degrees and suddenly destroy their cash cows such as text and picture messages (iPhones use free email).
It’s going to take months before Verizon realizes what hit them, or even that they got hit at all.
I went to the Apple store this weekend to try out the phone, and I was greeted by a line. A line to get into the store to look around. While it was a brisk wait, the line never failed to fall below 10 people while I was there. Inside, the demo iPhones were plentiful.
My conclusion: Apple has another home run.
After all the hype, the iPhone really lives up to most it. Apple did an incredibly job highlighting its strengths without hiding its weaknesses, thus keeping expectations in check. Its interface is slick, it’s sexy, and its touch response was incredibly precise. After playing with it for a few minutes, the previously slick looking iPods looked dated. This thing is going to hit the MP3 player market like a firebomb on grass huts!
Once the first generation buyers show their friends what they have, it’s only going to generate more interest. I firmly believe it after using the phone myself.
The product sells itself.
