iPhone: 8 Hours of Talk, 250 Hours of Standby

Apple announced, today, that the iPhone will have eight hours of talk time. This talk time is 60% higher than the 5 hour talk time Steve Jobs announced in January. Wow.

Additionally, the surface of the iPhone has been upgraded to “optical-quality glass” to protect it from scratches. This addresses a major concern consumers noted when it was announced that the navigation required a touch interface, and dispels any notions that the iPhone will scratch as the Nano did.

Lastly, Apple has continued to exclude mention of a two year contract in its prices, raising suspicions that a two year contract is no longer required. When the iPhone was initially announced, it was a common complaint that a two year contract with Satan AT&T made the iPhone less desirable. However, none of Apple’s commercials or press releases since then have mentioned a two year contract, despite detailing the phone prices.

Along with the eight hours of talk time, a few other aspects got a notable upgrade:

  • 250 hours of standby time (over 10 days)
  • 6 hours of Internet use
  • 7 hours of video playback (two full movies)
  • 24 hours of audio playback

In this latest update, Apple has squashed some of the biggest hurdles the iPhone was facing. While the AT&T aspect is still in the air, it is good to see Apple doing whatever in their power to improve their most important product in the coming decade.

YouTube is Co-Hosting a Presidential Debate

This may not be news to some avid YouTube followers, but YouTube is hosting presidential debates with CNN on July 23rd (Democrats) and September 17th (Republicans). They are asking that people submit video questions that will be shown, live, during the debates to the presidential candidates.

This is what I am talking about! Rather than being a “website where TV content is shown”, YouTube is now a “TV channel” where, unlike regular TV, viewers will be invited to participate. This is something that no other network can replicate. It also underscores YouTube’s true vision, which is often misunderstood as a massive haven for copyright infringement.

One of the more interesting dynamics that arise from this is the use of visual cues during the video questions. For example, people can show pictures of loved ones or the rundown state of a building to illustrate their points. Not only does this force candidates to address issues they might not have otherwise ignored, but there is a potential to shift public perceptions if a video is really exceptional.

I’m expecting a whole lot of Iraq questions during the Republican debate (YouTube users are liberal leaning, after all), but maybe that’s just me.

Why a Digg Review Section is a Dumb Idea

A few weeks ago, Digg announced its intentions to move into restaurant and product reviews. Cashmore was optimistic about Digg changing its demographic, citing Facebook as an example of how that is possible. But I would first point at Netscape. Netscape, under the leadership of ex-CEO Calacanis, tried to take mainstream people and throw them into social media. The (terrible) results speak for themselves.

Check out the graph to the right. Netscape getting ownedIf you take that graph and go back another six months (when the switch was made), Netscape has lost nearly half of its daily page views and has dropped 200 points in the site rankings.

Netscape’s experiment shows that regular people may not be interested in interactive news in the way geeks are. I think it makes sense: how many times have you heard someone gloss over your explanation of something and say, “I don’t care, I just want to use it.” Regular consumers want to consume, not contribute, even if it is as little as clicking a button. This means that even with more readers, Digg’s stories would stay heavily technology oriented, eventually pushing mainstream readers away again.

Also, Digg isn’t Facebook. Facebook can introduce stuff nobody likes and get away with it because hey have the stickiness of a social network. Just look at Myspace and its garbage user interface, friend spamming, and ugly profiles. It doesn’t matter. Besides, Facebook expanded its audience in such a way as to not impact the current core functionality or site experience – another key reason why the expansion was a success.

There are other factors that worry me about Digg’s model being applied to products and restaurants:

  1. Digg is highly anti-commercial. Articles are buried (rejected) for merely being blogs due to suspected “blog spam” (making money from the ads). How would that mix with reviews?
  2. Restaurants are extremely local in nature. Digg is global. Even 20 miles is too far to make a review relevant most of the time.
  3. Fanaticism would run rampant. Anybody could vote up a product review without actually having or used the product. This means simple fan-boy-ism could boost an otherwise crappy product to the top spot without a single person ever even seeing the item in person.
  4. Who is qualified to vote up a review on a restaurant they’ve never been to? Maybe the entire staff at the place? (see next point)
  5. The system introduces a huge incentive for commercial postings. 
  6. The surge of commercial postings creates an reason for users to bury reviews very defensively.
  7. Defensive burying is a problem because genuine reviews require a lot of effort. Unlike news postings, a good review (commercial or not) would take hours to compile. It would be a strong deterrent for first time reviewers if their first submission was rejected for being “too commercial” simply for having ads on their blog.

I think Digg would be making a mistake by entering these markets. Review sites already exist for various products and are well indexed. Digg would, in the very best scenario, be spammed up with links to these sites. In the worst case, Digg would have wasted months trying to go “mainstream” only to further alienate users.

Digg already does social news well, and it needs to focus on doing that better. Digg should really focus on enhanced personalization so that each account gets its own customized list of “top” news items — this was another prong of the original announcement and I think they are dead on there.

How the iPhone Will Save Web Standards

Today, Apple has announced the beta release of Safari for Windows – the browser that will be shipped with every iPhone.

safari

This is great on multiple levels:

  1. Developers can finally run tests against the Safari browser without having a Mac (usually these tests simply didn’t happen). This was the reason many sites broke on Macs.
  2. Safari has a strong track record from Mac enthusiasts, which is a mostly separate crowd from Firefox enthusiasts. Thus, this may help further increase adoption of non-IE browsers.
  3. Applications can be tested against the iPhone without an actual iPhone in hand.

That last point is crucial. Right now, everything targets IE, and this is a pain for web development because IE bastardized web standards such as HTML and JavaScript. This meant anything you programmed had a chance to break in IE even if it worked in every other browser on the planet. 

The iPhone may be the best thing to have happened to the Internet since Firefox was born.

If the iPhone becomes the new target platform, standards become truly relevant. Why? Because for the first time in history, hordes of regular Joe consumers will have web access in the palm of their hand, and no company wants their website to completely break when viewed through the iPhone. This is especially true as more and more people begin to consume information strictly through their handheld devices and stop visiting web sites that don’t work on their phones. As a personal example, even though I read lots of news sources when on a desktop, on my Blackberry, I only read a select few sources that are built to handle mobile browsers.

The point is: web publishers can no longer choose to target IE. And as many analysts predict, with or without Apple, the mobile web will match or over take desktop web usage in the near future. Just take a look over at Japan to see what I mean.

So as a developer, I would like to thank the iPhone for making my life better. 🙂

Facebook Gets Videos, but It Sucks (a Lot)

video-pageFacebook introduced a new video section of their site recently (found at http://www.facebook.com/video/). As with all things Facebook, the section contains an extremely simple interface — a little too simple (more on that later). The whole thing smells like it was rushed. Overall, the Facebook Video section brings a few positive things to the table, and just plain sucks overall.

When you hit the site, it asks you to add the application to your profile. As with all new features, this is an “application.” After you add it, you are able to view videos. Immediately, a few things stand out:

  • Videos can be tagged with your friends, and you can search for videos tagged of you.
  • Video browsing emphasizes friends. Videos by strangers are nowhere to be found. Odd.
  • There is no video search (perhaps it will be part of the main search later)
  • Videos can be browsed by “latest”, “of you” and “tagged by friends.” That’s it. No other sort or filter options are available.

Once the application is installed, you are able to upload videos. Some (of the only good) highlights emerge:

  • Videos can be uploaded from your phone (cool!)
  • Videos can be directly recorded from the site (see picture below)
  • Video max length: 10 minutes.

video-types

That’s about the only good things I have to say about Facebook Videos. The video player has a few standard Facebook features such as its own wall, a list of people who are tagged in the video, its length, and a pause button. But this is where it got ugly. Where do I begin? Study the screen shot below.

lacking-interface

  • Their player is missing volume controls!
  • Where is the mute!! (I need to mention volume twice because that’s just stupid)
  • There is no embed link (not going viral, I see)
  • No full screen mode
  • No rating system
  • No favorites or book marking
  • No view counts
  • No tags or categories
  • No related videos (this is stupid)

I waited until the end of the video to see if I was presented with related videos. Instead, I got this:

end-button

When I clicked on Next Video, it took me to the next video made by that author. Complete rubbish! Worse, when you play all of an author’s videos, you only get a Play Again button! This is worse than YouTube’s first iteration.

The problem here is that Facebook is treating videos like photos. But videos are different from photos in that they require a greater investment of time, creating a desire to only view the “good stuff.” The lack of tags, categories, ratings, and favorites means browsing for quality videos becomes next to impossible; in fact, it is likely that quality gets drowned out in crappy-video noise.

Facebook Video sucks. Facebook is definitely catering to the home-made audience with its video site by integrating people-tagging, but its misunderstanding of what makes a good video site will be Facebook Video’s downfall. While they have undoubtedly made uploading a straight forward process, browsing videos is an unenjoyable and often painful experience.

I think this is all part of an elaborate (and stupidly executed) plan to get a higher bid offer from Yahoo. In fact, the pair were back in the headlines after rumors broke of buyout talks being renewed. A successful entry into the video market might push Facebook to a $2 billion price (that’s how much they want), since YouTube went for $1.6 billion. But with garbage like this, gaining market share is complete fiction.

Without serious enhancements – and soon – this video site will languish in obscurity as people realize it’s a piece of garbage. Just doing the research to write this article made me want to tear my eyes out and mute the speakers.

No, seriously.

iPhone – June 29th

Over the weekend, it became official that the release date for the iPhone is June 29th.

As others have begun to wonder, is there too much hype for the iPhone? Consumers are amazingly critical of gadgets that have an explicit utilitarian value. If the iPhone does wrong any one of the half dozen things users expect on their cell phone, it could fail to meet expectations. With over a million inquiries about the iPhone, and it barely being publicized off of the Internet (until this weekend), that alone is rather amazing. Some of its most likely buyers are people who are not computer savvy, but those that are simply – uh – rich.

Of course, if anybody has been paying attention during water-cooler talks, it’s clear that the first wave of buyers are trend setters and those in the social elite. Just as with the iPod, the iPhone is all about style and status. I honestly don’t think the first wave of buyers will care about the phone’s capabilities, so long as it’s good enough; they are happy with the overwhelming attention they’ll receive at every single social gathering for the next three months.

Is there such a thing as having too much hype over the next big fashion item? I don’t think status symbols works like that. We’ll find out on June 29th.

On a personal note: no, I won’t be getting one of these. My company provides me with a Blackberry, and those run on T-Mobile (which is not AT&T).

It’s Official: eBay Plans to Ruin StumbleUpon

StumbleUpon The rumors are over: eBay bought StumbleUpon for $75 million. Seeing as the two companies don’t exactly scream “similar” to me, I scoured the press release to find this explanation:

StumbleUpon is a great fit within our goal of pioneering new communities based on commerce and sustained by trust,” said Michael Buhr, senior director, eBay. “StumbleUpon’s downloadable toolbar provides an engaging and unique experience to its users, but it is the similarities in our approaches to the concept of community that make it such a compelling addition to eBay.”

No mention of its incredible quality-sorted index. No mention of its new video stumbling service. Only the toolbar and its “community.” Wow.

eBay doesn’t get StumbleUpon. They just see eyeballs and a toolbar. This purchase is going to ruin an otherwise great product.

So in other words, while you and I might see StumbleUpon as a vehicle for wasting time at work, eBay sees it as a “community based on commerce.” Furthermore, eBay’s eyes are locked squarely on StumbleUpon’s toolbar, making for certain the rumors that it plans to add its own stuff into it.

StumbleUpon’s toolbar is already pretty cluttered in its default installation. I certainly don’t look forward to eBay’s backwards mentality when it comes to UI design (try visiting their website and count how many inches down the content starts). This is a hot company about to get doused by eBay’s lame understanding of Web 1.0.

Digg Learned Its Lesson: Puts Censored Story Back

Some of you may recall the huge scandal over at Digg a few weeks ago. Well, history nearly repeated itself today when a story on the same topic broke today: hackers cracked a new AACS processing key (used to encrypt DRM). One can only assume the people behind AACS became angry and sent cease and desist orders to Digg.

Nevertheless, the story hit the front page of Digg and people were anxiously watching what would happen. Last time, Kevin Rose (founder of Digg) publicly declared Digg would no longer bow to external forces on censoring that topic. Well, the story disappeared from the front page without explanation despite having a large number of Diggs.

People noticed.

Users began talking about spamming the site about the news again, and duplicate stories were submitted for a short period of time. Searching for the processing key yielded no results, and people were getting a little upset. But in a surprising turn of events (and possibly the first time in Digg’s history), the story re-appeared on the front page within minutes.

Perhaps Digg management are evaluating the C&D letter and realizing that they have no merit (i.e., you can’t claim copyright on a number?). If I had to guess, an admin censored the post upon seeing a C&D letter, only to be corrected by someone higher up in management that realized that wasn’t a good idea. Either way, it seems Digg learned its lesson.

Microsoft Surface – Microsoft Steals Apple’s Business Model

Microsoft announced a new product today: Surface. The concept is simple: a giant touch screen that can accept input from multiple fingers as well as regular objects. This product has real potential for Microsoft’s future.

What’s interesting is that this is essentially a new operating system. Gone is the Start Bar, Outlook, MSN messenger, IE, and other familiar Windows components. It doesn’t even matter if it is running Windows or Linux because software for Surface is clearly unique to it alone. Granted, Surface may use Windows, but their approach makes them resemble Apple. Microsoft just developed a stealth OS built specifically on hardware they designed — by going the integrated route, Microsoft just pulled an Apple.

It starts off tame: managing photos and videos through a drag and drop interface. Rotating, scaling, and emailing the photos with one finger. Then they show you how browsing music and building a play list is easier than ever. Yawn. But keep reading.

organizing photos

It gets real interesting when they place a Zune on it and start dragging music into it. They put a camera on it and all of the pictures “fall out” for managing. Brushes are used to draw. Files are dragged and copied from one camera to another.

It takes a bolder step when they show it recognizes phones placed on it, allowing for instant price comparisons. Any product with an RFID tag could probably use this interface. Displaying additional information such as videos and reviews would be a natural next step. 

comparing phones at a retailer

Suddenly this product has a real benefit to retailers nationwide – the ability to use dynamic media to convert curiosity into a sale.

They continue with demos showing a man use Live Maps to chart out a day plan and then drag it into a cell phone. They show how restaurants might use it to let people digitally order. They even thought of splitting a bill using multiple credit cards by simply dragging items to your card.

paying for dinner

It has uses in education, entertainment, retail, dining, and the home. In short, its a new personal computer with an interface that makes sense to people of all ages. Anywhere a computer is used now, this has the potential to replace it.

Most of the time, when Microsoft releases new products, I think to myself that they are just marketing something old in a new way. But Surface is different. Granted, the technology behind it is not new, but the “stuff on the table” idea (probably patented like crazy) makes this technology good to great.

The product is due out in Winter 2007. If they do this right, it could be their next “big thing.”

Google Buys GreenBorder – Maybe for Google Pack?

Google made a strange acquisition today. Google bought GreenBorder, a security application that sand boxes browsers. Basically, it ensures that when you close your browser, you destroy any potentially malicious viruses and trojans along with your session. It is a “sand box” as in stuff that happens in your browser stays in your browser, keeping the rest of your system safe.

This is weird on multiple levels:

  • It has nothing to do with their core business
  • Computer security is a highly competitive and saturated market, leaving little room for massive unchecked growth
  • Browser security is a tiny niche of computer security and leaves other major Internet based attack vectors open, especially through Outlook (ugh, huh?).

One potential use for this application is the ability to keep competing search engines from changing a user’s default home page. This normally might exist to fight off spyware, but one can see the additional competitive edge.

Google’s aim may be to make the Internet experience much safer. But I can’t see this gaining wide adoption unless they give it away. Google Pack currently has Norton and an anti-spyware scanner, and this would make a cozy fit for a browser-centric solution. It would keep the computer clean where the scanners may have failed. Thus, in my eyes, this is all about bolstering the software offering of Google Pack.

Google Pack is a free software suite given away by Google (click on link below to try it out). It is a collection of free tools such as Firefox, Skype, and Picasa.

Google Pack is an important pawn in Google’s strategy. In giving away the software suite, they are also increasing the market shares of:

  • Firefox
  • Google Desktop
  • GTalk
  • Google Toolbar

These are all very important components in keeping Microsoft at bay. So my prediction is that we should see this (or a re-branded version of it) in Google Pack within six to eight months.

Update: Techcrunch has their own theory that this purchase is for enhancing Google Desktop.